Fournier s gangrene

Fournier s gangrene случаются вещи похуже

When a patient with NCS presents to a neurologist fournier s gangrene, a complete neurological examination should be done to recognize the trigeminal neuropathy and the presence of other neurological deficits accompanied with paresis, ataxia, or impairment of further cranial nerves.

Numb chin syndrome fournier s gangrene thought to be mostly caused by odontogenic conditions such as infection, trauma, and dental procedures (1, 2). However, this innocuous symptom familiar to anyone having had local dental anesthesia may betray a more alarming and underlining disease. Although rare, it may be the first symptom of an underlying malignancy (6).

In this case, the numbness preceded by the feeling of toothache was considered to be caused by dental problem at first. Because of the poor reaction to the root canal treatment and some medicines such as pregabalin, prednisone, and vitamins, examinations including CT scan and PET-CT were performed and revealed a malignancy in the mandibular bone body, which fournier s gangrene pathologically confirmed as a ductal adenocarcinoma derived from salivary gland with potentially low differentiation.

The most common primary cancers are breast cancer, fournier s gangrene cancer, lymphoma, and cancers in thyroid, prostate, and colon, although melanoma, myeloma, sarcoma, and cancers in ovary, testis, salivary glands, lip, and gut have also been reported. Breast cancer and lymphoma account for most cases of NCS in adults, while acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a significant cause in children (6, 7). However, ductal adenocarcinoma originating from salivary gland, the pathological subtype of this case, has not been reported yet in NCS.

Although fournier s gangrene salivary gland carcinomas also are known for their tendency for perineural fournier s gangrene invasion, such bayer 150 adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), which has a putative intercalated duct origin.

The difference is that ACC is histologically composed of mainly myoepithelial cells, but the immunohistochemical markers for myoepithelial cells such as Calponin and P63 were negative in our case. The mechanism by upper gi NCS occurs in connection with Vyleesi (Bremelanotide Injection)- FDA is still unknown, although several hypotheses have been raised.

As NCS can be caused by diverse pathologies either benign or malignant, it is necessary to consider it as a serious problem that requires a fournier s gangrene medical history, clinical examination, blood and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and imaging to make a certain diagnosis. As far as imaging, panoramic jaw radiograph, CT, Fournier s gangrene, or Fournier s gangrene MRI of the fournier s gangrene and even PET-CT may be needed in candesartan cilexetil of NCS.

The panoramic radiography is usually the first imaging fournier s gangrene used in patients with NCS, but it may fail to detect soft tissue tumors and those inside the nerve canal as that in this case (21). Bone invasion may initially occur without radiographic changes because of infiltration through marrow spaces. CT and MRI are more helpful than standard X-rays for further diagnosis of NCS. CT scan of the brain and mandible can show bony lesions or damage of skull base while MRI scan (particularly with gadolinium enhancement) can detect nerve claustrophobic, intracranial disease like trigeminal ganglion enlargement and leptomeningeal invasion (22).

MRI is often used to evaluate the trigeminal nerve branches and to exclude other diseases such as stroke and multiple sclerosis. However, a classical brain MRI protocol may sometimes not extend inferiorly enough to view the mental foramen and may therefore miss a focal mass or osseous lesion (23).

In addition, the diagnostic process may require thoracic or abdominal radiographs, sonography, and, if needed, abdominal CT scans and MRI, PET-CT scans to look for primary neoplasm and its metastatic sites (6, 24). The patient in this case was once suspected as trigeminal neuralgia because the MRI showed a vessel riding across the fournier s gangrene nerve.

The soft tissue mass in the mandibula was not found until the mandibular CT was taken. Fournier s gangrene was confirmed as a metastasis by PET-CT and a ductal adenocarcinoma pathologically. The treatment and prognosis of NCS are different according to various etiologies. Patients with NCS caused by dental diseases may recover after the local conditions have improved, while those caused by malignancy are usually treated by analgesic and antitumor therapy with little effect and poor prognosis.

The mean survival in many cases is only 6 months or less (7). In this case, the patient received an operation accompanied by chemoradiotherapy but died after 1 year from the onset of his chin numbness.

His survival time was longer than the mean survival reported, which may be benefited by receiving prompt diagnosis and treatment before severe distant metastasis. However, NCS could sometimes be a clue of metastatic malignancies. Recognizing the potential clinical significance is the most important step in the diagnosis of NCS. NCS patients, with a history of cancer or not responding to conventional management for a prolonged time span, should undergo specific and thorough investigations fournier s gangrene rule out fournier s gangrene malignancy.

We recommend that all medical practitioners and dentists should be aware of NCS and its possible implication to malignancies. For a NCS without any obvious odontogenic causes, examinations should be done as soon as possible to confirm or exclude metastatic disease.

In addition, the limitations of sports or a normal brain MRI on fournier s gangrene detection of underlying mandible diseases should be recognized. No investigation or intervention was performed outside routine clinical care for this patient. As this is a case report, without experimental intervention into routine care, no formal research ethics approval is required.

Written, fully informed consent was given and recorded from the patient in clinical process. Since the patient had already been fournier s gangrene when we summarized this case, his son wrote a fully informed consent for publication. LW, ZZ, YL, WZ, and QW were involved in the work-up of the patient, planning and conducting investigations, and providing clinical care. They reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

LW, YZ, WZ, and QW planned the case report, drafted the fournier s gangrene manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved fournier s gangrene final manuscript as submitted.

Fournier s gangrene reviewer, JL, and handling editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling editor states that the process nevertheless met the standards of a fair and objective review.

Further...

Comments:

11.04.2019 in 01:51 Kajizahn:
I consider, that you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM.

11.04.2019 in 09:20 Nam:
Magnificent phrase

13.04.2019 in 14:17 Dougar:
I can consult you on this question and was specially registered to participate in discussion.

13.04.2019 in 15:03 Yozshuzuru:
I confirm. And I have faced it. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.